Opinion
2000-09558
Submitted September 29, 2003.
October 27, 2003.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), rendered September 12, 2000, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by the defendant to law enforcement officials.
Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Melissa S. Horlick of counsel), for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Solomon Neubort of counsel), for respondent.
Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
It is well settled that a police officer's use of guile and deception need not render a defendant's statements involuntary absent a showing that the deception was so fundamentally unfair as to deny due process or that a promise or threat was made that could induce a false confession ( see People v. Tankleff, 84 N.Y.2d 992; People v. Tarsia, 50 N.Y.2d 1). Contrary to the defendant's contention, the deception employed by the detective to obtain his statements did not deprive him of due process or otherwise render them involuntary ( see People v. Louis, 239 A.D.2d 435; People v. Ingram, 208 A.D.2d 561; People v. Foster, 193 A.D.2d 692, 693; see also People v. Anderson, 42 N.Y.2d 35, 38).
The defendant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
SANTUCCI, J.P., S. MILLER, GOLDSTEIN and COZIER, JJ., concur.