From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jones

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Nov 24, 2021
No. 2021-06628 (N.Y. App. Div. Nov. 24, 2021)

Opinion

2021-06628 Ind. 1474/15

11-24-2021

The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Linwood Jones, also known as Miek, also known as Linwood Bonner, appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel; Robert Ho on the brief), for respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, New York, NY (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel; Robert Ho on the brief), for respondent.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin P. Murphy, J.), rendered September 21, 2018, convicting him of conspiracy in the fourth degree and attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 U.S. 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 U.S. 738) was sufficient because it addressed the essential issues in this case, and although the brief failed to analyze the validity of the defendant's waiver of the right to appeal and the enforceability of the waiver, the enforceability or unenforceability of the defendant's waiver of the right to appeal makes no practical difference to the Anders outcome (see People v Morris, 187 A.D.3d 938, 939; People v Warney, 186 A.D.3d 1273; People v Murray, 169 A.D.3d 227, 233). Moreover, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues that could be raised on appeal (see People v Murray, 169 A.D.3d 227). Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 A.D.3d 252; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631).

MASTRO, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, BRATHWAITE NELSON and GENOVESI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jones

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Nov 24, 2021
No. 2021-06628 (N.Y. App. Div. Nov. 24, 2021)
Case details for

People v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Linwood Jones, also…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Nov 24, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-06628 (N.Y. App. Div. Nov. 24, 2021)