From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jones

California Court of Appeals, Third District, Yolo
Oct 16, 2009
No. C061195 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 16, 2009)

Opinion


THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TABRAYLAH CONAY JONES, Defendant and Appellant. C061195 California Court of Appeal, Third District, Yolo October 16, 2009

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Super.Ct.No. 081024

SCOTLAND, P. J.

When defendant Tabraylah Conay Jones was arrested for possessing cocaine on February 24, 2008, she identified herself as Chambreya Blanson. As a result of this misrepresentation, Blanson (who is defendant’s sister) later was arrested on a warrant and booked into the county jail.

Defendant was charged with transportation of cocaine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (a)), possession of cocaine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a)), false impersonation of another (Pen. Code, § 529, subd. 3), and misdemeanor transportation of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11360, subd. (b)). She entered a negotiated plea of no contest to false impersonation, and the other charges were dismissed. In accordance with the plea agreement, the court imposed the lower term of 16 months in state prison, ordered her to pay a $200 restitution fine and a $200 parole revocation fine, and specified that she was entitled to 32 days of custody credit.

Defendant appeals, but did not obtain a certificate of probable cause. (Pen. Code, § 1237.5.) We appointed counsel to represent her on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and asking us to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant.

Having undertaken an independent examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

The judgment is affirmed. The trial court is directed to amend the abstract of judgment to reflect that count 3 is Penal Code section 529, subdivision 3 (not 529.3) and to send a certified copy of the amended abstract to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

We concur: HULL, J. CANTIL-SAKAUYE, J.


Summaries of

People v. Jones

California Court of Appeals, Third District, Yolo
Oct 16, 2009
No. C061195 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 16, 2009)
Case details for

People v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TABRAYLAH CONAY JONES, Defendant…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Third District, Yolo

Date published: Oct 16, 2009

Citations

No. C061195 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 16, 2009)