From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 26, 1999
260 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 26, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silverman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in discharging two jurors without conducting a sufficiently thorough inquiry to ascertain when the jurors would be available to continue service (see, CPL 270.35). However, the defendant did not object to the sufficiency of the court's inquiry prior to the discharge of the jurors, or request that any further inquiry be made. Under these circumstances, the defendant's claim is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Torres, 80 N.Y.2d 944; People v. Ocasio, 258 A.D.2d 303; People v. Correll, 207 A.D.2d 410; People v. Riccardi, 199 A.D.2d 432).

O'Brien, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 26, 1999
260 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM JONES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 26, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 281

Citing Cases

People v. Settles

However, the defendant did not object to the sufficiency of the court's inquiry prior to the discharge of the…

People v. Morales

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in declining to discharge a sworn juror without conducting…