Opinion
March 8, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.).
Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant argues that his plea allocution under Indictment No. 16050/89 failed to establish that, at the time of his admitted participation in the robbery of the victim, he was "armed with a deadly weapon" (Penal Law § 160.15). This contention is not reviewable as a question of law, because the defendant did not move to withdraw his plea on this ground prior to the imposition of sentence (see, e.g., People v. Mackey, 77 N.Y.2d 846; People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v. Coombs, 138 A.D.2d 619; People v. Kruger, 132 A.D.2d 624; People v. Andre, 132 A.D.2d 560; see also, People v. Batts, 186 A.D.2d 208; cf., People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662), and we decline to review this contention in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.