From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jimenez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 6, 2001
281 A.D.2d 176 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

March 6, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J.), rendered June 1, 19 99, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of conspiracy in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 5 to 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

Mathew Kleiner, for respondent.

Cynthia Feathers, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Tom, Lerner, Friedman, JJ.


The court properly permitted the People to introduce evidence of drug transactions claimed by defendant to constitute uncharged crimes. The jury could reasonably infer that the transactions in question were part of the charged crime of conspiracy. In any event, these transactions were admissible as background information that was relevant, under the circumstances, to establish the criminality of defendant's conduct (see,People v. Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233; People v. Ponnapula, 266 A.D.2d 32, 33,lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 951).

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Jimenez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 6, 2001
281 A.D.2d 176 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Jimenez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. YENSIE JIMENEZ, ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 6, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 176 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 4

Citing Cases

People v. Snagg

Contrary to defendant's contention, "[a]n indictment for conspiracy need not allege every overt act"…