From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jeudy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2017
153 A.D.3d 1203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

09-28-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alexandra JEUDY, Defendant–Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (William B. Carney of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (William B. Carney of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Obus, J.), rendered June 12, 2014, convicting defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of petit larceny, and sentencing her to time served, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's challenges to her initial plea to a felony are unpreserved (see People v. Conceicao, 26 N.Y.3d 375, 382, 23 N.Y.S.3d 124, 44 N.E.3d 199 [2015] ), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the record as a whole demonstrates that the initial plea allocution was sufficient and that the plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary (see People v. Tyrell, 22 N.Y.3d 359, 365, 981 N.Y.S.2d 336, 4 N.E.3d 346 [2013] ).

After defendant complied with the conditions of her felony plea, she was permitted to replead to a misdemeanor. Although her challenge to the second plea proceeding is exempt from preservation requirements because sentence was immediately imposed, that challenge is unavailing because it was permissible for the court to incorporate the initial plea allocution by reference (see People v. Muir, 134 A.D.3d 641, 21 N.Y.S.3d 617 [1st Dept.2015], lv. denied 26 N.Y.3d 1147, 32 N.Y.S.3d 61, 51 N.E.3d 572 [2016] ).

In any event, the only relief defendant requests is dismissal of the indictment rather than vacatur of the plea, and she expressly requests this Court to affirm the conviction if it does not grant a dismissal. Since we do not find that dismissal would be appropriate, we affirm on this basis as well (see e.g. People v. Teron, 139 A.D.3d 450, 29 N.Y.S.3d 175 [1st Dept.2016] ).

TOM, J.P., MAZZARELLI, ANDRIAS, OING, SINGH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jeudy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2017
153 A.D.3d 1203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Jeudy

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alexandra JEUDY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 28, 2017

Citations

153 A.D.3d 1203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
153 A.D.3d 1203

Citing Cases

People v. Vasquez

In light of the foregoing, and as we otherwise find that a penological purpose exists for restoring the…

People v. Julien

In view of the serious nature of these counts, a penological purpose would be served by remanding the matter…