Opinion
A145399
10-25-2019
In re J.E., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. J.E., Defendant and Appellant.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. SJ1502416901)
In July 2016, this court issued an opinion upholding a term of J.E.'s probation that required minor to submit to a search of his electronics, including passwords, at the request of a probation officer or peace officer. Review was granted by the California Supreme Court "pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in In re Ricardo P." On September 26, 2019, the California Supreme Court transferred this case to this court with directions to vacate its decision and reconsider the cause in light of In re Ricardo P. (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1113. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.528(d).) In response to our inquiry regarding whether passage of time has rendered the probation condition moot, the parties advised this court that minor's case has been dismissed and he is no longer subject to probation. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
/s/_________
POLLAK, P. J. WE CONCUR: /s/_________
TUCHER, J. /s/_________
BROWN, J.