From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. James

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 17, 2017
146 A.D.3d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

01-17-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Taiquan JAMES, Defendant–Appellant.

Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Steven J. Miraglia of counsel), for appellant. Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Shannon Henderson of counsel), for respondent.


Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Steven J. Miraglia of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Shannon Henderson of counsel), for respondent.

ACOSTA, J.P., MAZZARELLI, MANZANET–DANIELS, WEBBER, GESMER, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Cassandra M. Mullen, J. at suppression hearing and nonjury trial; Wayne Ozzi, J. at sentencing), rendered November 29, 2010, convicting defendant of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a term of one year of probation, unanimously affirmed.

Although the consolidated suppression hearing and nonjury trial, conducted over defendant's objection, was contrary to CPL 710.40(3), reversal is unwarranted. We find that defendant was not prejudiced as a result of the procedure (see People v. Gonzalez, 214 A.D.2d 451, 625 N.Y.S.2d 203 [1st Dept.1995], lv. denied 86 N.Y.2d 794, 632 N.Y.S.2d 508, 656 N.E.2d 607 [1995] ). In any event, the only relief defendant requests is dismissal of the accusatory instrument rather than a remand for further proceedings, and he expressly requests this Court to affirm his conviction if it does not grant a dismissal. Defendant has not shown that this case should be dismissed.

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations . The record supports the court's finding that the search was based on valid consent (see generally People v. Gonzalez, 39 N.Y.2d 122, 128, 383 N.Y.S.2d 215, 347 N.E.2d 575 [1976] ). Among other things, the police advised the consenting party of her right to refuse consent, and she affirmatively requested the officers to remove any firearm that might be secreted in her apartment.


Summaries of

People v. James

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 17, 2017
146 A.D.3d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. James

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Taiquan JAMES…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 17, 2017

Citations

146 A.D.3d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
46 N.Y.S.3d 539
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 278

Citing Cases

People v. Murphy

As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. Although the consolidated suppression hearing and…

People v. James

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 1st Dept: 146 AD3d 574 (Bronx)…