From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jacobowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 26, 1982
89 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

July 26, 1982

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.), rendered June 12, 1981, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.


Judgment reversed, on the law, plea vacated, motion to suppress granted, and matter remitted to Criminal Term for further proceedings consistent herewith. The judgment must be reversed and the plea vacated because the warrant authorizing video surveillance was not executed until 17 days after issuance despite the fact that CPL 690.30 (see People v. Teicher, 52 N.Y.2d 638) requires execution within 10 days. As a consequence, the fruits of the surveillance and the tangible property seized must be suppressed. Damiani, J.P., Lazer, Gulotta and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Jacobowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 26, 1982
89 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

People v. Jacobowitz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ARON JACOBOWITZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 26, 1982

Citations

89 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

People v. Tonner

If execution occurs after ten days, the property recovered must be suppressed. SeePeople v. Kiah , 156 AD3d…

People v. Mercado

But they cannot merely present an identical warrant containing the same information set forth in the original…