Opinion
May 22, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The claimed errors which allegedly occurred during cross-examination of the defendant and his witnesses and during summation, are, for the most part, unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05). Moreover, none of the instances of alleged prosecutorial misconduct, singly or in combination, served to deprive the defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Roopchand, 107 A.D.2d 35, affd 65 N.Y.2d 837).
Additionally, we note that the sentence imposed was a proper exercise of discretion and was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Thompson, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.