From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jackson

California Court of Appeals, Third District, Sacramento
Sep 10, 2009
No. C061206 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 10, 2009)

Opinion


THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RANTAE LAMAR JACKSON, Defendant and Appellant. C061206 California Court of Appeal, Third District, Sacramento September 10, 2009

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Super. Ct. No. 07F00728

HULL, Acting P. J.

About 11:30 a.m. on January 19, 20 0 7, defendant Rantae Lamar Jackson put a gun to the victim’s stomach as he got out of his car. Defendant took the victim’s necklace, watch, and cell phone. Defendant demanded the victim’s car keys and pistol-whipped the victim in the face with the gun. Defendant drove off in the victim’s car.

Defendant entered a negotiated plea of no contest to carjacking (Pen. Code, § 215, subd. (a)) and admitted the personal use of a firearm (Pen. Code, § 12022.53, subd. (b)) in exchange for dismissal of the remaining counts and allegations and a stipulated term of 19 years, that is, the upper term of nine years for carjacking plus 10 years for the firearm use enhancement. The court sentenced defendant to state prison accordingly.

Defendant appeals. His request for a certificate of probable cause (Pen. Code, § 1237.5) was granted.

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

Disposition

The judgment is affirmed.

We concur: ROBIE, J., BUTZ, J.


Summaries of

People v. Jackson

California Court of Appeals, Third District, Sacramento
Sep 10, 2009
No. C061206 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 10, 2009)
Case details for

People v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RANTAE LAMAR JACKSON, Defendant…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Third District, Sacramento

Date published: Sep 10, 2009

Citations

No. C061206 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 10, 2009)