Opinion
2011-11-3
Ralph Cherchian, Albany, for appellant.
Gwen Wilkinson, District Attorney, Ithaca (Gary Surdell of counsel), for respondent.
Before: MERCURE, J.P., MALONE JR., KAVANAGH, McCARTHY and EGAN JR., JJ.
KAVANAGH, J.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tompkins County (Rowley, J.), rendered November 26, 2008, which resentenced defendant following his conviction of the crimes of burglary in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree and petit larceny.
In March 2000, defendant was convicted of burglary in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree and petit larceny, and was subsequently sentenced to an aggregate prison term of 8 1/2 years. His sentence did not include, as required, a period of postrelease supervision ( see Penal Law § 70.45 [1] ). Defendant's conviction was later affirmed (282 A.D.2d 830, 725 N.Y.S.2d 406 [2001], lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 902, 730 N.Y.S.2d 800, 756 N.E.2d 88 [2001] ), and he was released from prison in March 2008, after he had served his entire sentence. Upon his release from prison, the People filed an application to have defendant resentenced so that he would be required to serve a mandatory term of postrelease supervision. In December 2008, County Court granted the People's request and defendant now appeals.
Defendant's challenge to County Court's decision to resentence him was filed after he served his entire sentence, including the period of postrelease supervision. As a result, his challenge to the validity of the resentence is moot and this appeal must be dismissed ( see People v. McLaine, 64 N.Y.2d 934, 488 N.Y.S.2d 648, 477 N.E.2d 1102 [1985]; People v. Facen, 67 A.D.3d 1478, 1479, 888 N.Y.S.2d 454 [2009], lv. denied 14 N.Y.3d 800, 899 N.Y.S.2d 134, 925 N.E.2d 938 [2010]; People v. John, 288 A.D.2d 848, 850, 732 N.Y.S.2d 505 [2001], lv. denied 97 N.Y.2d 705, 739 N.Y.S.2d 106, 765 N.E.2d 309 [2002]; People v. De Leo, 214 A.D.2d 762, 762–763, 624 N.Y.S.2d 982 [1995] ).
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot.
MERCURE, J.P., MALONE JR., McCARTHY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.