From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jackson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 26, 2014
118 A.D.3d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-06-26

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony JACKSON, Defendant–Appellant.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Désirée Sheridan of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Diane A. Shearer of counsel), for respondent.



Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Désirée Sheridan of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Diane A. Shearer of counsel), for respondent.
MAZZARELLI, J.P., ACOSTA, FREEDMAN, RICHTER, CLARK, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ann Donnelly, J.), rendered July 19, 2010, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of trespass, and sentencing him to a conditional discharge for a period of 1 year, and 10 days of community service, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). There is no basis for disturbing the court's credibility determinations. A lack of license or privilege to enter premisesmay be established by circumstantial evidence, including evidence of consciousness of guilt (Matter of Lonique M., 93 A.D.3d 203, 205–206, 939 N.Y.S.2d 341 [1st Dept.2012] ). Defendant entered a New York City Housing Authority building by means of neither a key nor a buzzer, but by taking advantage of the door being opened when someone exited. Defendant initially lied to the police about being a resident of the building, and then admitted that he was not a resident. His false statement evinced a consciousness of guilt ( see People v. Ficarrota, 91 N.Y.2d 244, 250, 668 N.Y.S.2d 993, 691 N.E.2d 1017 [1997];Lonique M., 93 A.D.3d at 206, 939 N.Y.S.2d 341) that, when coupled with his means of entry, supported the inference that he entered unlawfully.

The accusatory instrument was legally sufficient to establish the element of entry without license or privilege, and it was not required to negate the possibility that one of the numerous residents of the building invited defendant to enter ( see People v. Davis, 13 N.Y.3d 17, 31–32, 884 N.Y.S.2d 665, 912 N.E.2d 1044 [2009];see also Lonique M., 93 A.D.3d at 207, 939 N.Y.S.2d 341).


Summaries of

People v. Jackson

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 26, 2014
118 A.D.3d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony JACKSON…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 26, 2014

Citations

118 A.D.3d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
118 A.D.3d 635
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4854

Citing Cases

People v. Westwood

“the defendant wait[ing] at the entrance of the above location carrying a plastic bag until someone entered…

People v. Singer

There is no basis for disturbing the jury's credibility determinations. Defendant's lack of a license to…