From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 2005
23 A.D.3d 1057 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

KA 02-01960.

November 10, 2005.

Appeal from an amended sentence of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered June 25, 2002. The amended sentence ordered defendant to pay restitution.

DENIS A. KITCHEN, JR., WILLIAMSVILLE, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Present: Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Kehoe, Martoche and Pine, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the amended sentence so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Contrary to defendant's contention, it was not necessary for County Court, "in ordering restitution in addition to imprisonment, to consider defendant's ability to pay" ( People v. Emmi, 254 AD2d 840, 840, lv denied 92 NY2d 949; see People v. Holmes, 300 AD2d 1072, 1073; People v. Weinberg, 213 AD2d 506, 507, lv denied 88 NY2d 970; see generally Penal Law § 60.27). Defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for our review ( see CPL 470.05) and, in any event, would not require vacatur of the restitution order under the circumstances of this case. Defendant expressly stated that he would not challenge the amount of restitution recommended by the Hearing Officer and imposed by the court ( see generally People v. Horne, 97 NY2d 404, 414 n 3 [2002]; People v. Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 280-281).


Summaries of

People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 2005
23 A.D.3d 1057 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DEMAINE JACKSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 10, 2005

Citations

23 A.D.3d 1057 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 8435
803 N.Y.S.2d 471

Citing Cases

People v. Travis

However, to the extent that defendant further argues that the restitution order should have been vacated due…

People v. Joseph

Upon the Court's own motion, the memorandum and order entered February 6, 2009 ( 59 AD3d 942, amended on…