From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 12, 1976
54 A.D.2d 1132 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

November 12, 1976

Appeal from the Erie County Court.

Present — Marsh, P.J., Moule, Cardamone, Simons and Goldman JJ.


Decision reserved, case held and matter remitted to Erie County Court for further proceedings in accordance with memorandum: At the time defendant pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of manslaughter in the first degree, defendant admitted that he had "shot somebody" but asserted that his actions were in self-defense. This assertion should have triggered a further inquiry by the trial court as to the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime and the availability of any defenses. (People v Serrano, 15 N.Y.2d 304.) Such an inquiry was necessary to determine whether defendant's plea was voluntarily and knowingly made (see People v Selikoff, 35 N.Y.2d 227; People v Nixon, 21 N.Y.2d 338).


Summaries of

People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 12, 1976
54 A.D.2d 1132 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

People v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES JACKSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 12, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 1132 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

People v. Thomas

Therefore, only those issues fully disclosed in the record which relate either to the exercise of…

People v. Nenni

d not establish all of the necessary elements thereof, to wit, that it was a loaded gun, and so it should…