From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 28, 1995
221 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 28, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.).


Defendant's contention that the court improperly announced a Sandoval ruling without any type of hearing or oral argument was not preserved for appellate review. Were we to reach the claim, we would find it to be without merit, because the record does not indicate that defendant made any Sandoval application in the first place, and defendant could not have been prejudiced by a gratuitous sua sponte ruling, partially in his favor.

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 28, 1995
221 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CRAIG JACKSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 28, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 463

Citing Cases

People v. Fuller

sue of a defendant's credibility is a question entrusted to the sound discretion of the court, reviewable…

People v. Fuller

"The extent to which prior convictions bear on the issue of a defendant's credibility is a question entrusted…