From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Irvin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 1984
99 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

February 6, 1984


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Canudo, J.), rendered December 23, 1980, convicting him of rape in the first degree (four counts), sexual abuse in the first degree (four counts), sodomy in the first degree (three counts), kidnapping in the second degree, assault in the third degree and menacing, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction for kidnapping in the second degree, and the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing the said count. As so modified, judgment affirmed. As this court recently noted on the appeal of defendant's codefendant ( People v Ruiz, 96 A.D.2d 603): "The conviction for kidnapping in the second degree cannot stand because the evidence revealed that any detention of the victim was incidental to the crimes of rape and sexual abuse (see People v Cassidy, 40 N.Y.2d 763; see, also, People v Webster, 54 A.D.2d 703; People v Fraser, 54 A.D.2d 965; People v Ghee, 53 A.D.2d 699; People v Mabery, 51 A.D.2d 557)". Gibbons, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Irvin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 1984
99 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Irvin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT IRVIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 6, 1984

Citations

99 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Morales

Since the rule's purpose is to prevent the unfair enhancement of punishment by the kidnapping statute for…

People v. Irvin

The defendant was convicted, upon a jury verdict, of, inter alia, rape in the first degree (four counts),…