From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Irizarry

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
Mar 16, 2022
No. 2022-01806 (N.Y. App. Div. Mar. 16, 2022)

Opinion

2022-01806 Ind. 2016-00161

03-16-2022

The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Nathan Irizarry, appellant.

Nathan Irizarry, Comstock, NY, appellant pro se. Miriam E. Rocah, District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Raffaelina Gianfrancesco and William C. Milaccio of counsel), for respondent.


Nathan Irizarry, Comstock, NY, appellant pro se.

Miriam E. Rocah, District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Raffaelina Gianfrancesco and William C. Milaccio of counsel), for respondent.

HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J., VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 10, 2020 (People v Irizarry, 184 A.D.3d 667), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered September 5, 2017.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 U.S. 745; People v Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277).

LASALLE, P.J., BRATHWAITE NELSON, MALTESE and FORD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Irizarry

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
Mar 16, 2022
No. 2022-01806 (N.Y. App. Div. Mar. 16, 2022)
Case details for

People v. Irizarry

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Nathan Irizarry…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Mar 16, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-01806 (N.Y. App. Div. Mar. 16, 2022)