From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Innis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 9, 2004
2002-03568 (N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 9, 2004)

Opinion

2002-03568.

Decided February 9, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), imposed March 27, 2002, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Richard L. Herzfeld, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Sholom J. Twersky of counsel; Robert W. Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., ANITA R. FLORIO, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, HOWARD MILLER and WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion.

PRUDENTI, P.J., FLORIO, KRAUSMAN, H. MILLER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Innis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 9, 2004
2002-03568 (N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 9, 2004)
Case details for

People v. Innis

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. EDUARDO INNIS, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 9, 2004

Citations

2002-03568 (N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 9, 2004)