From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ince

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 2000
273 A.D.2d 101 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

June 15, 2000.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Daniels, J.), rendered December 15, 1998, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and bail jumping in the first and second degrees, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 5 to 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

Shari R. Michels, for respondent.

Michael J. Mannheimer, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Wallach, Rubin, Friedman, JJ.


Defendant's motion to withdraw his plea was untimely, since the record establishes that it was made after the sentence was imposed (see, CPL 220.60). In any event, defendant's asserted ground would not have been a valid basis for withdrawal of the plea. Defendant's request was based entirely upon his dissatisfaction with his negotiated sentence. Accordingly, no further inquiry would have been necessary.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Ince

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 2000
273 A.D.2d 101 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Ince

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. NIQUAN INCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 15, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 101 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
710 N.Y.S.2d 883

Citing Cases

People v. Norman

To the extent that defendant sought that relief after the imposition of sentence, his motions were untimely (…