From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hymes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 4, 1994
208 A.D.2d 355 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

October 4, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Fisch, J.).


Like the petitioner in Matter of Oliver v. Justices of N Y Supreme Ct. ( 36 N.Y.2d 53), the defendant herein had been indicted for murder and had successfully requested a charge of manslaughter as a lesser-included offense to a jury that eventually announced itself "hopelessly deadlocked". Contrary to defendant's contention, the court is not obligated to inquire of the jury whether it reached a partial verdict in the absence of an indication that the jury wishes to return such a verdict. The absence of a partial verdict is fatal to defendant's contention that since the jury reportedly had unanimously determined to acquit on the higher count, retrial on the higher count constitutes double jeopardy (Matter of Oliver v. Justices of N Y Supreme Ct., 36 N.Y.2d 53, supra).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ellerin, Ross, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Hymes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 4, 1994
208 A.D.2d 355 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Hymes

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEON HYMES, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 4, 1994

Citations

208 A.D.2d 355 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 742

Citing Cases

Rivera v. Firetog

The trial court is uniquely situated to evaluate whether a mistrial is appropriate, and deference is to be…

Rivera v. Firetog

In light of the evidence that the jury had reached a verdict on the murder count, and defense counsel's…