From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hottois

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1997
244 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 19, 1997

(Appeal from Judgment of Wayne County Court, Sirkin, J. — Attempted Burglary, 3rd Degree.)

Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Balio and Fallon, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Wayne County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant contends, and the People concede, that the People violated the terms of the plea bargain by recommending at sentencing that defendant receive the maximum rather than the minimum term of imprisonment. Defendant was thereafter sentenced by County Court to the maximum term of imprisonment. Because defendant was denied the benefit of his plea bargain, we modify the judgment by vacating the sentence, and we remit the matter to another County Court Judge for resentencing in accordance with the terms of the plea bargain or to afford defendant the opportunity to withdraw his plea (see, People v. Shabazz, 203 A.D.2d 947; see also, Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 261-263).


Summaries of

People v. Hottois

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1997
244 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Hottois

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LOREN W. HOTTOIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 19, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
668 N.Y.S.2d 131

Citing Cases

People v. Ortiz

The court did not advise defendant that a harsher sentence than he bargained for could be imposed if…

People v. Hoeltzel

, the appellate courts of this State have recognized that where, as here, the People violate a plea inducing…