From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hosear

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 29, 2015
134 A.D.3d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

16453 3866/11.

12-29-2015

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hollis HOSEAR, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jeffrey A. Wojcik of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jeffrey A. Wojcik of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), entered on or about March 7, 2014, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent predicate sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art. 6–C), unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of remanding for a further hearing on defendant's request for a downward departure, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The court properly assessed defendant 10 points under the risk factor for forcible compulsion. Defendant, taking advantage of a crowded subway car, pressed up against a trapped victim, moved his penis against her buttocks, breathed heavily and made loud noises over the course of several minutes, in a manner that caused her to be aware that she was being sexually assaulted and too scared to say anything. Although there was insufficient evidence of forcible compulsion by physical force (see People v. Mack, 18 N.Y.3d 929, 942 N.Y.S.2d 457, 965 N.E.2d 959 2012 ), the evidence was sufficient to show forcible compulsion by an implied threat that placed the victim in fear of physical injury.

However, defendant proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, mitigating circumstances related to his debilitating medical condition (see People v. Stevens, 55 A.D.3d 892, 867 N.Y.S.2d 108 2d Dept.2008 ). We remand the matter for a further hearing with respect to his current medical condition and future prognosis, given the concern that defendant could recover his capability of reoffending.

TOM, J.P., RENWICK, SAXE, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hosear

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 29, 2015
134 A.D.3d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Hosear

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hollis Hosear…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 29, 2015

Citations

134 A.D.3d 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 9608
21 N.Y.S.3d 611

Citing Cases

People v. Sudderth

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Gilbert C. Hong, J.), entered on or about November 22, 2016, which…

People v. Sanchez

Furthermore, the record indicates that the defendant had no disciplinary infractions in prison, spanning a…