From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hooper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1997
245 A.D.2d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 31, 1997

Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree, defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his motion to suppress the identification testimony of three witnesses on the ground that the photo array was unduly suggestive. We reject that contention ( see, People v. Guthrie, 222 A.D.2d 1084, lv denied 87 N.Y.2d 973; see also, People v. Chipp, 75 N.Y.2d 327, 336, cert denied 498 U.S. 833). In any event, the People established an independent basis for the in-court identification of defendant ( see, People v. Rahming, 26 N.Y.2d 411, 417).

We conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, McCarthy, J. — Manslaughter, 1st Degree.)


Summaries of

People v. Hooper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1997
245 A.D.2d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Hooper

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARCUS HOOPER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 1021 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 61

Citing Cases

People v. Hooper

Memorandum: We previously granted defendant's motion for a writ of error coram nobis (People v. Hooper, 289…