From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Holmes

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 23, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1236 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-23

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jermaine D. HOLMES, appellant.

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Thomas C. Costello of counsel), for respondent.


Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Thomas C. Costello of counsel), for respondent.

*907 Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (J. Doyle, J.), imposed June 29, 2010, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal ( see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145; People v. Wright, 89 A.D.3d 874, 874–875, 932 N.Y.S.2d 353). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

MASTRO, A.P.J., BALKIN, HALL and ROMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Holmes

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 23, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1236 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Holmes

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jermaine D. HOLMES, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 23, 2012

Citations

95 A.D.3d 1236 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 4029
943 N.Y.S.2d 906

Citing Cases

People v. Winslow

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed. Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant did not validly…

People v. Norfort

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed. Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant did not validly…