Opinion
February 10, 1997.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), rendered June 23, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Before: Bracken, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Altman, JJ.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the People failed to prove his identity as one of the robbers beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Caballero, 177 AD2d 496). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).
The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.