From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hodne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 1993
197 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

October 12, 1993

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in not instructing the jury as to the defense of justification. However, the defendant's trial counsel never requested such a charge. Therefore, any error of law with respect thereto was not preserved for appellate review. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to review the issue.

Furthermore, we find that the defendant was afforded meaningful representation by counsel (see, People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137).

We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Eiber and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hodne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 1993
197 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Hodne

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TODD S. HODNE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 12, 1993

Citations

197 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
604 N.Y.S.2d 751

Citing Cases

People v. Martinez

Therefore, the issue is not preserved for appellate review. Under the facts and circumstances of this case,…