From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hinkley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 29, 1987
133 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

October 29, 1987

Appeal from the County Court of Rensselaer County (Dwyer, Jr., J.).


When this matter was previously before us, we withheld decision in order to get a dispositive determination as to whether County Court ruled on defendant's suppression motion ( 132 A.D.2d 862). County Court has indicated that before it could render a decision on the suppression motion defendant absconded. After defendant was found and brought back to the court, he pleaded guilty to the charged crimes. No decision was ever rendered on the suppression motion. By pleading guilty prior to obtaining an order denying his suppression motion, defendant has waived appellate review (see, People v. Fernandez, 67 N.Y.2d 686, 687; People v. Plummer, 122 A.D.2d 285, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 915, 916).

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P.J., Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hinkley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 29, 1987
133 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Hinkley

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GERALD HINKLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 29, 1987

Citations

133 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Carty

On this appeal, defendant initially challenges the admissibility of the inculpatory statement made by him…