From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 14, 2001
284 A.D.2d 193 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

June 14, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Martin Marcus, J.), rendered September 13, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree and assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 25 years to life and 20 years to life, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Lara R. Binimow, for respondent.

Bruce D. Austern, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Williams, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Lerner, Saxe, JJ.


Under the unusual circumstances presented, the court properly exercised its discretion in delivering curative instructions advising the jury that certain evidence had originally been precluded at defendant's request. After making a pretrial ruling that the drug-trafficking relationship between defendant and the victim and their status as codefendants in a pending drug case would be precluded, the court expressly warned the defense not to use this ruling as a proverbial sword rather than a shield. However, defendant did precisely that. By revealing these facts during his direct testimony, defendant made it appear that the People were hiding them. Accordingly, the court's instructions were appropriate to undo the damage caused to the People's case (cf., People v. Fardan, 82 N.Y.2d 638). Furthermore, there was nothing in the curative instructions that could be viewed as disparaging defendant or defense counsel (compare, People v. Henderson, 169 A.D.2d 647). Defendant's remaining arguments on this subject are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence.


Summaries of

People v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 14, 2001
284 A.D.2d 193 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. ADAM HILL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 14, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 193 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
726 N.Y.S.2d 103

Citing Cases

People v. Walls

It is axiomatic that a defendant may not use a ruling as both a sword and a shield. See, eg, People v.…

People v. Spellicy

s-examination of one of the police officers who had been present at the time of defendant's arrest (seePeople…