From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 1997
245 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 8, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The police conduct in this case was justified in its inception and reasonably limited in scope at each successive step in response to the circumstances presented (see, People v. De Bour, 40 N.Y.2d 210; People v. Hicks, 68 N.Y.2d 234; People v. Duuvon, 77 N.Y.2d 541). Consequently, the Supreme Court correctly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony and physical evidence.

Mangano, P.J., Copertino, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 1997
245 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM HILL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 388 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 584