From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Henderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 2000
269 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted December 22, 1999

February 10, 2000

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Marlow, J.), rendered August 4, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Cristina D'Amato Arvoy, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Bridget Rahilly Steller of counsel), for respondent.

WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO.


DECISION ORDER

ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his right to appellate review of his contention that the court erred in finding that the evidence adduced at a preliminary hearing was sufficient to hold him for Grand Jury action (see, People v. Di Raffaele, 55 N.Y.2d 234, 240 ; cf., People v. Dunbar, 53 N.Y.2d 868, 869 ; People v. Wiggins, 198 A.D.2d 535 ).


Summaries of

People v. Henderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 2000
269 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. ROBERT HENDERSON, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 10, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
702 N.Y.S.2d 878

Citing Cases

People v. Quinn

Counsel cannot be held ineffective for failing to make a motion or argument that has little or no chance of…

People v. Quinn

Counsel cannot be held ineffective for failing to make a motion or argument that has little or no chance of…