From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Feliciano

Court of Appeals of New York.
Nov 21, 2013
2 N.E.3d 921 (N.Y. 2013)

Opinion

2013-11-21

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Wilson FELICIANO, Appellant.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York City (Laura Boyd of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (Martin J. Foncello and Richard Nahas of counsel), for respondent.


Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York City (Laura Boyd of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (Martin J. Foncello and Richard Nahas of counsel), for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant's contention that he completed the terms of his original plea agreement and was therefore entitled to dismissal of the indictment is not preserved for our review. Upon his discharge, defendant did not move for dismissal following the events that he now says constituted performance of the agreement. Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT, RIVERA and ABDUS–SALAAM concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Feliciano

Court of Appeals of New York.
Nov 21, 2013
2 N.E.3d 921 (N.Y. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Feliciano

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Wilson FELICIANO, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Nov 21, 2013

Citations

2 N.E.3d 921 (N.Y. 2013)
22 N.Y.3d 986
979 N.Y.S.2d 554
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7764

Citing Cases

People v. Pollard

In any event, regardless of whether defendant's waiver of the right to appeal forecloses review of his claims…

People v. Oliver

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.The defendant's challenge to the validity of his plea of guilty is…