From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Haywood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 15, 1994
203 A.D.2d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 15, 1994

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.


Appeal from judgment insofar as it imposes sentence unanimously dismissed and judgment affirmed. Memorandum: The record indicates that, following entry of the judgment appealed from, defendant moved pursuant to CPL 440.20 (1) to set aside the sentence on the ground that it was invalid as a matter of law. That motion was granted, defendant was resentenced, and he has separately appealed from that judgment. Therefore, the judgment appealed from insofar as it imposes sentence has been superseded by the judgment resentencing defendant (see, People v Boscana, 114 A.D.2d 316; People v Cicero, 100 A.D.2d 627; see also, People v Rosenfeld [appeal No. 1], 187 A.D.2d 965, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 892).


Summaries of

People v. Haywood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 15, 1994
203 A.D.2d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Haywood

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS HAYWOOD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 966 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 1016

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

We thus conclude that the court properly refused to suppress the weapon and defendant's ensuing statements.In…

PEOPLE v. TIDD

Present — Centra, J.P., Carni, Lindley, Green and Gorski, JJ. It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the…