From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Haulsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 3, 2002
298 A.D.2d 129 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1722

October 3, 2002.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered August 28, 2000, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

GRACE VEE, for respondent.

MICHAEL J.Z. MANNHEIMER, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Williams, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Gonzalez, JJ.


Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The radioed description of defendant, which included a detailed clothing description, was sufficiently specific to provide probable cause to arrest despite the passage of about 45 minutes from the drug transaction, since no one else nearby matched the description (see People v. Rampersant, 272 A.D.2d 202, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 870). At the very least, the police had reasonable suspicion upon which to detain defendant pending a confirmatory identification. Contrary to defendant's argument, the evidence warranted a reasonable inference that the confirmatory identification was made by an officer with personal knowledge of the fact that defendant had sold drugs (see People v. Ketcham, 93 N.Y.2d 416).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Haulsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 3, 2002
298 A.D.2d 129 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Haulsey

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT HAULSEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 3, 2002

Citations

298 A.D.2d 129 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
747 N.Y.S.2d 758

Citing Cases

People v. James

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. The radioed description was sufficiently specific…

People v. Blak

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. The undercover officers' radioed descriptions were…