From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hartzog

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 12, 1999
263 A.D.2d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted May 21, 1999

July 12, 1999

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), rendered March 31, 1998, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

George M. Harmel., Jr., Central Islip, N.Y., for appellant.

James M. Catterson, Jr., District Attorney, Riverhead, N Y (Kerri N. Lechtrecker of counsel), for respondent.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the court improperly interjected itself into the proceedings is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit. The court's questioning of witnesses facilitated an orderly progression of the trial, and the minimal interjections were proper ( see, People v. Yut Wai Tom, 53 N.Y.2d 44).

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant youthful offender status for this senseless and vicious crime despite his eligibility for such treatment ( see, People v. Vera, 206 A.D.2d 494; People v. Barr, 168 A.D.2d 625). Moreover, the sentence is not excessive or unduly harsh ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Hartzog

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 12, 1999
263 A.D.2d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Hartzog

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. MELVIN HARTZOG, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1999

Citations

263 A.D.2d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 920

Citing Cases

People v. Townsend

The defendant's previous convictions were probative in evaluating his credibility, and thus the court's…

People v. DeNormand

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of murder in the second…