From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hart

Michigan Court of Appeals
Aug 28, 1970
26 Mich. App. 370 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

Docket No. 9,298.

Decided August 28, 1970.

Appeal from Genesee, Donald R. Freeman, J. Submitted Division 2 July 28, 1970, at Lansing. (Docket No. 9,298.) Decided August 28, 1970.

Carol Hart was convicted, on her plea of guilty, of assault with intent to rob and steal being armed. Defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, Robert F. Leonard, Prosecuting Attorney, and Donald A. Kuebler, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Earle S. Clark, III, for defendant on appeal.

Before: DANHOF, P.J., and McGREGOR and QUINN, JJ.


The defendant, while represented by counsel, pled guilty to the reduced charge of assault with intent to rob while being armed, MCLA § 750.89 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.284), and was sentenced to a term of 25 to 35 years in prison.

On appeal the defendant argues that she should be granted a new trial because her plea was invalid under GCR 1963, 785.3. She alleges it was involuntary for the reasons that she feared the use of an illegally obtained confession and that there existed a promise of reduction in the charge.

A plea is voluntary if it is knowingly and understandingly made with the benefit of counsel even though an illegally obtained confession existed. People v. Temple (1970), 23 Mich. App. 651. A fulfilled promise of leniency is not a basis for holding a guilty plea involuntary. The record shows that the plea was freely, understandingly and voluntarily made and complied with GCR 1963, 785.3.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Hart

Michigan Court of Appeals
Aug 28, 1970
26 Mich. App. 370 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

People v. Hart

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. HART

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 28, 1970

Citations

26 Mich. App. 370 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
182 N.W.2d 630

Citing Cases

People v. Morris

Assuming, for purpose of this argument only, that the confession was illegally obtained and therefore…

People v. Wickham

If the rule in this state is to be changed, the Supreme Court or the Legislature must change it. See People…