From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harry Otto

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 14, 1976
356 N.E.2d 481 (N.Y. 1976)

Opinion

Submitted September 10, 1976

Decided October 14, 1976

Appeal from the Monroe County Court, HYMAN T. MAAS, J.

Peter L. Yellin, Public Defender (Edward J. Nowak of counsel), for appellant.

Lawrence T. Kurlander, District Attorney (Michael Nelson of counsel), for respondent.


Order reversed and the information dismissed. The violation of harassment was not established beyond a reasonable doubt. In addition, the conduct involved did not constitute a violation or come within the scope of the statute (People v Carvelas, 35 N.Y.2d 803).

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.


Summaries of

People v. Harry Otto

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 14, 1976
356 N.E.2d 481 (N.Y. 1976)
Case details for

People v. Harry Otto

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HARRY OTTO, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 14, 1976

Citations

356 N.E.2d 481 (N.Y. 1976)
356 N.E.2d 481
387 N.Y.S.2d 1010

Citing Cases

Sirlin v. Town of New Castle

CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the factual allegations…

People v. Valerio

This constitutes proof of neither the course of conduct nor the repeated commission of acts proscribed by the…