From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harris

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 19, 1973
74 Misc. 2d 707 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)

Opinion

June 19, 1973

Appeal from the Criminal Court of the City of New York, County of New York, MITCHELL J. SHERWIN, J.

Jesse Zaslav for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( David L. Levinson and Anthony J. Girese of counsel), for respondent.


Absent proof that the defendant desk clerk was aware that the premises were to be used for purposes of prostitution, which proof was not herein adduced, the mere knowing rental of a room to parties known not to be married to each other does not constitute a violation of the Penal Law.

Accordingly, as recognized by the respondent, reversal is required.

The judgment of conviction should be reversed on the law and the facts, complaint dismissed, and fine remitted.

Concur — LUPIANO, J.P., FINE and FRANK, JJ.

Judgment of conviction reversed, etc.


Summaries of

People v. Harris

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 19, 1973
74 Misc. 2d 707 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)
Case details for

People v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RUDOLPH HARRIS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 19, 1973

Citations

74 Misc. 2d 707 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)
345 N.Y.S.2d 890

Citing Cases

People v. Behncke

At the outset, this court rejects defendant's contention that the factual portion of the information is…