Opinion
November 3, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Potoker, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We find that the photographic array shown to Vincenti Gaztambide, who had witnessed the shooting, was not unduly suggestive, and the hearing court's decision to allow Gaztambide to make an in-court identification was proper (see, Manson v Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98; People v McMickel, 105 A.D.2d 851; People v Jones, 85 A.D.2d 50).
We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions, including those advanced in his supplemental brief submitted pro se, and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.