From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hargro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1988
144 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

November 15, 1988

Appeal from the Erie County Court, Drury, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Denman, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The People appeal from an order which dismissed an indictment charging defendant with felony driving while intoxicated because the People failed to provide defendant with his statutory right to a speedy trial (CPL 30.30). The mere announcement of readiness for trial by a prosecutor does not satisfy the People's statutory obligation because the People must be able to substantiate that they are in fact ready to proceed (People v. Kendzia, 64 N.Y.2d 331, 337; People v. Dean, 45 N.Y.2d 651, 656). Only then may the court ascertain whether the People "effectively" announced their readiness for trial (People v. Brothers, 50 N.Y.2d 413, 417). Here, the court's finding that the People did not satisfy their burden in demonstrating their continued readiness during the period in question is amply supported by the record. Since 189 days were chargeable to the People, the court properly granted defendant's speedy trial motion.


Summaries of

People v. Hargro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1988
144 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Hargro

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. ERNEST HARGRO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1988

Citations

144 A.D.2d 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Robinson

In People v Howe ( 116 A.D.2d 990, 991 [4th Dept], lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 885), the concurring Judge wrote: "It…

People v. Blunt

Contrary to the warning of the dissent, therefore, we do not hold that a defendant may be proven guilty…