From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hanna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 16, 1992
185 A.D.2d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

July 16, 1992

Appeal from the County Court of Otsego County (Mogavero, Jr., J.).


Defendant's motion to suppress statements made by him to the arresting police officer was properly denied. The police officer's questioning of defendant at the place where defendant's vehicle had been stopped for a traffic violation about whether he had been drinking and driving was clearly investigatory rather than custodial interrogation (see, People v. Mathis, 136 A.D.2d 746, lv denied 71 N.Y.2d 899; People v. Hennigan, 135 A.D.2d 1082; People v. Brown, 104 A.D.2d 696). As to defendant's remaining contentions, they have been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Mikoll, J.P., Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Hanna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 16, 1992
185 A.D.2d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Hanna

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES F. HANNA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 16, 1992

Citations

185 A.D.2d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Totman

We also reject defendant's assertion that County Court erred in failing to suppress statements made by him to…

People v. Tittensor

These observations justified Kennedy's inquiry, in the course of his noncustodial investigation, as to…