Opinion
May 8, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the verdict was repugnant has not been preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05; People v Stahl, 53 N.Y.2d 1048). Moreover, upon viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt. Bracken, J.P., Eiber, Spatt and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.