From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hamdam

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 1, 2012
95 A.D.3d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-1

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jamil HAMDAM, appellant.

Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Laura Lieberman Cohen of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel), for respondent.


Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Laura Lieberman Cohen of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garnett, J.), imposed May 22, 2009, on the ground that the resentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the resentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

MASTRO, A.P.J., RIVERA, ENG, LEVENTHAL and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hamdam

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
May 1, 2012
95 A.D.3d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Hamdam

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jamil HAMDAM, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: May 1, 2012

Citations

95 A.D.3d 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3463
942 N.Y.S.2d 880