From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 24, 1988
143 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

October 24, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (McMahon, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant's challenge to the validity of the indictment is not reviewable on appeal from an ensuing judgment of conviction based upon legally sufficient evidence (CPL 210.30; People v Pelchat, 62 N.Y.2d 97; People v O'Connor, 126 A.D.2d 676).

We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 24, 1988
143 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD HALL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 24, 1988

Citations

143 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Cunningham

Initially, we note that the defendant's claim that the Grand Jury proceedings resulting in his indictment…