From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 8, 1996
233 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

November 8, 1996.

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Before: Present — Green, J.P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


At sentencing, defendant did not challenge either his status as a second felony offender or the accuracy of the dates set forth in the People's CPL 400.21 statement. Defendant, therefore, has waived his present contention that the allegations in the statement are inaccurate and insufficient to support Supreme Court's finding that defendant has been subjected to a predicate felony conviction ( see, CPL 400.21; People v Khatib, 166 AD2d 668, 669). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.)


Summaries of

People v. Hall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 8, 1996
233 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF New YORK, Respondent, v. TIMOTHY HALL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 8, 1996

Citations

233 A.D.2d 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
649 N.Y.S.2d 882

Citing Cases

People v. Simpson

In any event, defendant's contention lacks merit. Defendant expressly waived that filing and thus waived…

People v. Cruz

Initially, the defendant asserts that the Supreme Court erred in sentencing him as a violent predicate felon.…