From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hagen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 18, 1982
86 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

January 18, 1982


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kooper, J.), rendered October 19, 1979, convicting her of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. During cross-examination of defendant, the trial court ordered an overnight recess. At that time, the court gave the following instruction: "I'm instructing you not to discuss with this witness, Mr. Jacobs [defendant's counsel], her testimony in any manner, shape or form, and I do not think that I am depriving her of her right to counsel. She's on the stand. She's being cross-examined, and I'm instructing you not to do it." Though defendant's counsel objected to the directive, he stated that he would obey it. We believe that such instruction violated defendant's constitutional right to assistance of counsel (see Geders v. United States, 425 U.S. 80; People v. Narayan, 54 N.Y.2d 106). Gibbons, J.P., Gulotta, O'Connor and Bracken, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hagen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 18, 1982
86 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

People v. Hagen

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SANDY HAGEN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 18, 1982

Citations

86 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

State v. Mebane

Some state courts have formulated per se reversal rules since Geders. See, e.g., Jackson v. United States,…

Perry v. Leeke

ver holiday recess, but error held harmless because judge gave attorney ample opportunity to meet with…