From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hackett

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 20, 2012
93 A.D.3d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-03-20

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Raymond HACKETT, appellant.

Steven A. Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y. (Azra Feldman of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Thomas Constant of counsel), for respondent.


Steven A. Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y. (Azra Feldman of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Thomas Constant of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ambro, J.), rendered December 13, 2010, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and attempted conspiracy in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal ( see People v. Ramos, 7 N.Y.3d 737, 819 N.Y.S.2d 853, 853 N.E.2d 222; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145; People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 280, 590 N.Y.S.2d 46, 604 N.E.2d 108; People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 11, 543 N.Y.S.2d 968, 541 N.E.2d 1022; *887 People v. Duah, 91 A.D.3d 884, 936 N.Y.S.2d 907). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appellate review of his challenge to the hearing court's suppression determination ( see People v. Kemp, 94 N.Y.2d 831, 833, 703 N.Y.S.2d 59, 724 N.E.2d 754; People v. Pena, 73 A.D.3d 1216, 1216–1217, 900 N.Y.S.2d 913; People v. Johnson, 58 A.D.3d 868, 868, 870 N.Y.S.2d 919).

The defendant's contention that the County Court coerced him into pleading guilty is unpreserved for appellate review ( see People v. Strong, 80 A.D.3d 717, 717–718, 914 N.Y.S.2d 679; People v. Scivolette, 80 A.D.3d 630, 630–631, 914 N.Y.S.2d 662; People v. Dash, 74 A.D.3d 1859, 1859, 902 N.Y.S.2d 490). In any event, the defendant's contention is unsupported by the record ( see People v. Strong, 80 A.D.3d at 717–718, 914 N.Y.S.2d 679; People v. Scivolette, 80 A.D.3d at 631, 914 N.Y.S.2d 662; People v. Bravo, 72 A.D.3d 697, 698, 899 N.Y.S.2d 280; People v. Pagan, 297 A.D.2d 582, 582, 747 N.Y.S.2d 174).

DICKERSON, J.P., CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hackett

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 20, 2012
93 A.D.3d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Hackett

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Raymond HACKETT, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 20, 2012

Citations

93 A.D.3d 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 2115
939 N.Y.S.2d 886

Citing Cases

People v. Persaud

People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 259–60, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645). The defendant's valid waiver of…

People v. Oseni

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and…