Opinion
February 22, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Heller, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence adduced at the trial in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).
The court's charge to the jury, viewed as a whole, adequately conveyed to the jury the proper standards for evaluating the evidence presented (see, People v Canty, 60 N.Y.2d 830).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit (see, People v Bynum, 70 N.Y.2d 858; People v Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245; People v Charleston, 56 N.Y.2d 886; People v Robinson, 137 A.D.2d 564). Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, Balletta and O'Brien, JJ., concur.