From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Greene

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Mar 20, 2019
170 A.D.3d 1039 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

2011-09651 Ind. No. 2203/09

03-20-2019

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Richard GREENE, Appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Andrea Yacka–Bible of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and William H. Branigan of counsel; Deanna Russo on the brief), for respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Andrea Yacka–Bible of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and William H. Branigan of counsel; Deanna Russo on the brief), for respondent.

ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J., ROBERT J. MILLER, BETSY BARROS, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fernando Camacho, J.), rendered September 15, 2010, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493. Counsel has informed this Court that the defendant has not authorized counsel to raise any issue that would allow him to withdraw his plea, and thus, does not wish for counsel to challenge the denial of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement authorities. Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no remaining nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id. ; People v. Murray , ––– A.D.3d ––––, 93 N.Y.S.3d 694 [2d Dept. 2019] ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 A.D.3d 252, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676 ; People v. Paige , 54 A.D.2d 631, 387 N.Y.S.2d 399 ; cf. People v. Gonzalez , 47 N.Y.2d 606, 419 N.Y.S.2d 913, 393 N.E.2d 987 ).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MILLER, BARROS and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Greene

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Mar 20, 2019
170 A.D.3d 1039 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. Greene

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Richard Greene…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Mar 20, 2019

Citations

170 A.D.3d 1039 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
170 A.D.3d 1039
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 2114

Citing Cases

People v. Brown

Here, the brief submitted by assigned counsel summarily identifies a nonfrivolous issue that could be raised…

People v. Brown

to raise the issue, and, therefore, counsel is submitting an Anders brief. There is no indication that…